Connect with us

News

Assessing, managing risk in 2024 procurement policy and plan

The Authors

The Authors

This year presents the procurement industry with yet another opportunity to navigate, innovate and reinvigorate our procurement plans, strategy and direction.

In retrospect, the lessons gathered from the major events in the global economy last year will obviously be a guide leading into this year.

The fact of the matter is, going into this new year, our guiding principles in procurement should not be an obstacle in achieving our goals, but must only serve as a guide to success and achieving corporate goals.

Advertisement

We must be innovative, anticipatory and forward-looking in all our procurement endeavours. The achievement of this success can only be met when we know how to clearly access and mitigate our risk factors and turn them into advantageous opportunities.

It is important to appreciate that in this New Year, there are two key things that every organization needs to underpin in their procurement processes thus a well-defined procurement policy as well as its accompanying procedures.

These are, at best, the most significant documents that help in shaping decision making and ultimately, mitigating risks to the business.

Fitzgerald-Bassey Consultancy Limited, a consultancy firm have painstakingly developed and explained how to mitigate risk in procurement in the year 2024.

Advertisement

This is mainly to mitigate risks within the Supply Chain, to help build shocks to absorb unforeseen events, creating alternatives plans for the what ifs, and minimize unplanned and unforeseen events which could disrupt one’s supply chain.

Understand and personalise concept of risk  

In the past year, one of the things we came to appreciate in the management of risk, for the majority of our clients, is for clients to have a clear understanding of what their risks are within their supply chains.  

Many did not understand the risk involved in their business and therefore did not plan to mitigate their risks.

Advertisement

Most often in procurement, when risk is mentioned, most procurement practitioners’ default to financial risks to the underestimation of other risks such as supply, operational, legal and reputational risk.

In simple terms, risk is the possibility of an event or action impacting the success or objectives of your procurement process. In essence, anything that is likely to become a hinderance to the successful procurement process is a risk, and all of these things that come to mind should be considered in your procurement planning process for the year.

When we clearly get to understand what our risks are, we are half way through the problem. By understanding and personalising the concept of risk, you get to know which ones apply to your supply chain and the ones which do not.

Identify, Analyse, Evaluate potential risks

Advertisement

Basic amongst risk management is identifying the possible loopholes that will be classified as risk factors and essentially conducting a risk assessment, which primarily involves analysing your procurement process and identifying any potential threats or vulnerabilities.

Identified risks should then be classified as High, Medium and Low risk. Within your procurement policies, pay particular attention to the very high risk and medium risk while keeping and eagle eye on the low as well since they also have the potential to also pull up surprises, with a resultant negative impact on your bottom-line.

For instance, within a procurement context, some of the very high-risk factors include sub-contractor failure, project delays, budget overruns, and non-compliance with regulations.

With supplier failure topping the chart, the very likelihood of your procurement of a very essential items being delayed by a supplier, especially in our part of the world, should not underestimated.

Advertisement

Once potential risks have been identified, you need to use a tool such as a 4×4 risk assessment matrix to rate a risk’s probability of occurrence (Probability) and its Impact (the negative consequences to cost, time, resources, etc.) if a risk occurs.

This will help understand the severity of the risk and help enact mitigations to counteract the risk.

Probability

Risk probability, or likelihood, is the possibility of a risk event occurring. The likelihood can be expressed in both a qualitative and quantitative manner.

Advertisement

When discussing probability in a qualitative manner, terms such as frequent, possible, rare etc. are used.

It is also possible to describe the probability in a numerical manner. This can be done using scores, percentages and frequencies defined by the organization.

Impact

Impacts are often defined as the consequences, or effects of a risk event on the project objectives.

Advertisement

These impacts can be both beneficial and harmful to the objectives. The impact of risk events on different project objectives can be defined in both a qualitative and quantitative manner. These project objectives are cost, schedule, quality, scope, health, safety, etc.

Prepare for the risk – Risk Impact & Probability Matrix

Practitioners should evaluate the possibility of a risk occurring against the impact it can have on the business. These evaluations should help define the mitigating strategies for such risks.

Based on the evaluation, you can then develop risk management strategies to mitigate or reduce the impact of each risk. In mitigating and managing risk, these strategies have shown to be very effective and reliable.  

Advertisement

High Probability / High Impact (Mitigate)

For circumstances deemed to be High Risk/High Impact, procurement practitioners must have a detailed action plan, monitored daily, weekly, monthly or as required, depending on the severity of the risk.

This is a probable disaster probability waiting to happen with a severe impact on the business.

If for example, a risk is identified of a potential gas pipe blowout, a comprehensive team including technical, procurement, senior decision makers may be put together to monitor the situation on a daily basis and take actions necessary to eliminate the risk.

Advertisement

Such a risk could have a catastrophic impact on the environment, business, reputation and bottom line of the organization.

High Probability/Low Impact (Management Challenge)

These are risk that are deemed likely to occur but have a low impact on the financials, reputation, Operations etc of the business. These risks are mostly due to uncertainties of numerous elements that individually, are minor risks but combined, could amount to higher risks.

Management should identify the individual risk and put in place contingency plans to counteract the individual risks identified.

Advertisement

Low Probability/ High Impact (Insure/Mitigate)

These are higher risks that have been identified but have a low probability of occurrence. The business and organization can insure against such risks. They can also put in operational structures to further reduce the probability of occurrence within the business.

Low Probability/Low Impact (Accept)

These are risks that have a low likelihood of occurring, and if they do, will have a minor impact on the organization. There is no need for a proactive management approach to mitigate against such risks. Management can accept those risks when they occur and deal with them on a one on one basis.

Advertisement

These are the some shock absorbers that can help you weather the storm in your procurement processes. As a procurement lead organisation, it is very important to involve all stakeholders in the development of these strategies to ensure buy-in and support for these guidelines.

Risks and the mitigating strategies should be reviewed regularly, depending on the nature of the business and the organization, and changes to the risk strategy register must be tracked and clearly logged. 

Owners of the identified risks must be clearly identified within the organisation. Accountability for these risks and mitigation strategies cannot be overemphasised.

Communicate plans to stakeholders

Advertisement

Once risk management strategies have been developed, they should be incorporated into your procurement and management processes. They should be subject to change as risks are fluid and circumstances change.

These should include clearly defined procedures for risk identification, assessment, and management. The policy and plan should also clearly map out the risk management procedure, outline roles and responsibilities for managing risks and the steps to be taken in case a risk does occur.

In all of it, it’s important to communicate the risk management strategies and procedures to all stakeholders involved in the procurement process.

This includes procurement staff, suppliers, and other relevant parties. Stakeholders should also be trained on how to identify and manage risks according to the policy and plan.

Advertisement

Leveraging technology and tools available that can help in managing risks in procurement has always been advantageous.

These include risk management software, data analytics, and automated processes. Consider utilising these resources to enhance your risk management efforts.

By following these steps, you can effectively access and manage risk in 2024.

Regularly reviewing and updating your risk management strategies will ensure the success of your procurement process and minimize any potential risks to your organization, with a resultant improvement in your bottom line.

Advertisement

 By Alvin Mingle & Kwabena Peprah

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News

Ex-GIIF CEO and Prof. Ameyaw-Ekumfi charged over $2m Sky Train fiasco

The Attorney General’s Office has formally charged former Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund (GIIF) CEO Solomon Asamoah and ex-board chairman Prof. Christopher Ameyaw-Ekumfi for their roles in the controversial Accra Sky Train project, which allegedly cost the state $2 million without authorisation.

The charges, filed today at the High Court (Criminal Division), include wilfully causing financial loss to the state under the Criminal Offences Act, conspiracy to commit crime through intentional dissipation of public funds, and intentional dissipation of public funds under the Public Property Protection Decree.

Prosecutors allege that in February 2019, the accused authorised a $2 million payment from GIIF to Africa Investor Holdings Limited for preliminary work on the Sky Train project – a system that was never built. The payment was reportedly made without proper board approval.

The Sky Train project, initiated in 2018 as a public-private partnership for an urban rail system in Accra, involved a memorandum of understanding between the Ministry of Railways Development, Africa Investor Holdings, and GIIF. However, investigations revealed the $2 million disbursement lacked proper due diligence and violated GIIF’s governance protocols.

Advertisement

Attorney General Dr. Dominic Ayine stated the accused acted outside their mandate, causing significant financial harm to the state. “The payment was unauthorised, and the project never materialised. This is a clear case of financial misconduct,” the filing stated.

The case will proceed in the High Court, with the AG’s office indicating some GIIF board members have agreed to testify as prosecution witnesses.

This prosecution forms part of the government’s broader crackdown on financial malfeasance, following earlier warnings of pending charges in the Sky Train and NSS ghost names scandals.

Source: Myjoyonline.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Interdict Sammy Gyamfi immediately to allow for investigations – NPP urges Mahama

The National Organiser of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Henry Nana Boakye, has called on President John Mahama to immediately interdict Mr Sammy Gyamfi from his role as acting Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod), to allow for investigations into his conduct following his public gifting of dollars to a self-lifestyle preacher.

The incident in question occurred on Saturday, May 10, 2025, when Mr Gyamfi was seen in widely circulated videos gifting bundles of US dollars to controversial evangelist Nana Agradaa while seated in his Range Rover. 

Speaking at a news conference held by the party on Tuesday, May 13, Mr Boakye emphasised the need for consistency in leadership and accountability, pointing to recent controversies involving senior public officials.

“We also call on the President to immediately interdict Mr Sammy Gyamfi as acting Chief Executive Officer of the Ghana Gold Board — or at least, he should interdict him pending the conduct of the investigation by the criminal investigation authorities of the state,” Boakye said.

Advertisement

Drawing a sharp comparison with a previous incident involving former Sanitation Minister Cecilia Dapaah, Boakye noted that Madam Dapaah was compelled to resign after reports emerged of large sums of money allegedly stolen from her residence, despite her long-standing public service and reputable family background.

“We cannot but remember when huge sums of money were reported to have been stolen from the residence of Madam Cecilia Dapaah, a woman who had worked in high places for over forty years before the incident — an MP since 2001, a deputy minister and a minister — married to a well-known, wealthy architect and consultant with nearly sixty years’ experience,” he remarked.

Boakye highlighted that under President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, Madam Dapaah stepped aside promptly, enabling thorough investigations by the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP).

“Investigations were duly conducted by the OSP against Madam Cecilia Dapaah and her husband after what the OSP described as seven months of extensive investigation and four months of collaborative inquiry,” he added.

Advertisement

The NPP is now demanding similar action from President Mahama in the interest of transparency, good governance, and public trust.

Source: Myjoyonline.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending