Connect with us

Features

The creation of an African ‘bloodstream’: Malaria control during the Hitler War, 1942–1945 (Part 3)

Until 1942, Allied medics had distributed a daily dosage of five grains of quinine to all army personnel, but when supplies ran low, they experimented with synthesised versions of the drug. They tested two prototypes: quinacrine (reverse-engineered by Sterling Winthrop Co. from a captured German I. G. Farben product in 1941) and mepacrine (synthesised by Imperial Chemical Industries in 1939). British Army experiments showed that quinacrine was a superior antimalarial because it had few side effects, but mepacrine was in greater supply, so the Allied doctors in Accra settled on a daily dose of the latter by mid-1943. The White soldiers disliked mepacrine because it caused a yellowish pigmentation on their skin, but they were forced to take it every morning with their breakfast. African soldiers were required to take the drug too, but use of chemical prophylaxes stopped there. Despite the belief that the residents of Accra formed a reservoir for the disease, the Allies never considered offering malaria prophylaxes to their civilian employees or to the broader African community.

At the start of the campaign, the Allies hoped that chemical insecticides might help them avoid the expense of reengineering the Korle watershed. The Americans were especially interested in using a silver-bullet approach to control the local mosquito population because they did not want to fund infrastructure projects that they would have to abandon after the war. In April 1942, the US Army began spraying the larvicide Paris green on open water surrounding the barracks, and trucked pyrethrum aerosol bombs into British camps to clear the buildings of mosquitoes. They proceeded to spray all houses within a one-mile radius of the airport, three times a week. In 1944, when adequate supplies became available, they switched to spraying with dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and by the end of the year, they were spraying all villages within an eight-mile radius of their camps, including the Accra city centre. Because DDT was not considered toxic to humans, the Malaria Control Group believed it was safe to disperse the chemical into water supplies. By 1944, the Allies commissioned a Piper J-3 cub to aerial spray the Korle, Kpeshi, and Klotey Lagoons, as well as partially spraying at the Sakumo Lagoon, several kilometres to the west of the city.

The spraying campaigns of 1942–45 were conducted at great expense in labour and materiel. For instance, during a three-month surge to eliminate the presence of mosquitoes and mosquito larvae at the airport in 1944, the Americans sprayed more than 1,000 pounds of Paris green, 2,000 pounds of pyrethrum, and 500 pounds of DDT, and they still found larvae in some of the streams leading into the lagoon. Major Macdonald had always believed that it would be cost effective to take the time to build drainage systems that would confine water to ditches and ponds, where smaller amounts of insecticides could be used, and as the war dragged on, the Americans too began to see the necessity of longer-term planning. In 1944, Allied engineers mapped out a pesticide spraying zone, re-dredged the sea outfall, and employed African crew to clear ditches and streams all the way up the Korle watershed. The Royal Army Medical Services followed up by spraying and oiling the waterways on a regular basis, a method that reduced the amount of pesticides used.

While the drainage scheme proceeded, Lt. Ribbands built his aforementioned Malaria Field Laboratory and began by collecting data about mosquito populations in the army camps. An expert on Anopheles gambiae, Lt. Ribbands had already researched the flight and biting habits of mosquitoes through a variety of experiments in India and West Africa, and his first step was to replicate a study that he had conducted in Sierra Leone, collecting mosquitoes from the Gold Coast Regiment barracks. The mosquito crew spread sheets on the floors of the tents and sprayed the air with pyrethrum or DDT to kill any insects inside. Afterward, Lt. Ribbands hired local men to pick up the mosquitoes and take them to a central laboratory at the airport for identification.

Advertisement

Lt. Ribbands and the malariologists expected to eliminate the mosquitoes around the Allied army barracks, but when he analysed the early results, he realised that the health of soldiers was still compromised by the in-flight of mosquitoes from nearby villages. According to the Allied records, the fear of contagion spurred the Malaria Control Group to relocate the villagers outside the airport to a newly conceived one-mile sanitary cordon. If this is true, then the Allies had extended the supposed flight range of a mosquito from one-quarter of a mile to a full mile and relocated the people of nearby Nima and Kanda because they had become “reservoirs of disease.” But though there are brief references to the planned evacuation of these nearby villages, no particular records demonstrate that a forced removal took place. If the evacuations did occur, they would have entailed the movement of hundreds of people (mostly Muslim newcomers to the city) by truck, as well as extensive documentation of claims for property. The lack of a paper trail raises the question of whether the residents of the villages were in fact relocated, but whether they were moved or not, a new spatial reckoning of Accra had been created because of the threat posed by infected mosquitoes.

Once he had established a cordon around the periphery of Korle Lagoon, Lt. Ribbands began to track the movements of Anopheles gambiae using his network of mosquito sheds. Built by African labourers in the employ of the British Army, the traps were single-room, timber-frame structures covered with screens and tar paper and fitted with baffles to let mosquitoes in at night. Ribbands modelled his traps on a prototype developed by American entomologist E. H. Magoon, but with a substantial difference: during his research in Jamaica, Magoon used only horses and mules to attract mosquitoes. Lt. Ribbands preferred human bait. Since he was largely concerned with studying the attraction of mosquitoes to White soldiers, it would have been logical to assign an American or British soldier to live in the traps, but the Allies were shorthanded, and Lt. Ribbands did not want to risk Allied airmen catching malaria. As a compromise, he hired African workers to sleep in the traps: “Africans selected as bait were chiefly men from the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast. They were chosen because most of them were homeless and it was felt that they would welcome the fine shelters provided by the mosquito traps, however, only those who could speak a few words of English were hired because they had to be able to understand the simple instructions. That the traps were home to these men was soon obvious when it was seen that they preferred to remain in the vicinity even during the daytime when they were not working.”

The choice of migrant workers as human bait is not surprising. These men go unnamed in the military records, but they were likely drawn from the same pool of immigrants recruited by the Gold Coast Medical Department as so-called volunteers in experiments at the Accra Laboratory during outbreaks of yellow fever and relapsing fever. But if they were homeless, as Ribbands suggested, it probably did not mean that they had nowhere to sleep. Newcomers to Accra usually were able to find a bed, even if that meant crowding in with their fellow migrants. And even if they did lack permanent residences, it is difficult to believe that they considered the traps desirable places to sleep. The sheds were small, filled with bugs, and lacking the benefit of the slightest breeze to cool the skin. It is also implausible that they thought of the traps as homes, considering that they were located in wooded areas and did not have locks to secure the doors. Moreover, the sheds were spread around a perimeter of several kilometres, and Lt. Ribbands rotated the men through the network of sheds at weekly intervals.

The military records also show that the hired bait did not always follow the rules. The men were required to stay in their sheds from sunset to sunrise. When they awoke, they were to leave the traps, carefully closing the baffles to catch the mosquitoes inside as they left, so that the spraying crew could lay down a tarpaulin, spray the sheds, and collect the insects. To monitor the sleeping patterns, Lt. Ribbands sent soldiers around the perimeter to ensure that the men serving as bait were actually sleeping in the traps and to prevent a reported “tendency to sit outside the trap at night”— an indication that the Africans who took part in the Malaria Control Group studies were not always willing and forthright participants. Though there is no record of outright resistance, the migrants did take measures to avoid mosquito bites and preserve their dignity.

Advertisement

[This piece is culled from a bookauthored by Jonathan Roberts, titled:Sharing the burden of sickness: A historyof healing and medicine in Accra]

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Features

 Who knows tomorrow?

 Recently a friend posted a sad news on his Facebook page, announcing the death of a school mate who had passed away, suddenly. The report had it that he was on his way to the airport to take a flight to Ghana.

I am sure this man had already informed the wife or a friend or a work colleague at work that he was returning home but he was not to return as a human being but as a dead body.

Such is life and so we need to be circumspect in how we go about things in life. The Bible reminds us that we are like grass which at one point in time looks elegant and the next moment becomes with­ered according to Psalm 90:5 and 6. It is for this reason that we need to guard our hearts with the word of God so that we shall be motivated to do the right thing, at all times.

This will enable us live on this planet, free from all sorts of troubles in our person­al lives, even if we ignore the question of Heaven and Hell. Living a disciplined life delivers us from any kind of trouble as the Bible declares in Galatians 5:23 that against such there is no law.

Advertisement

The uncertainty surrounding our lives on earth is the more reason why people should commit their lives into the hands of the one who created it, in the first place unless you believe that the world created itself and that it appeared from nowhere.

Otherwise, the logical thing to do is to recognize the authority of the creator and surrender to his Lordship. Heaven is real and Hell is real, so for us who know the truth and have received Jesus as our Lord and Saviour, the onus lies on us to encourage our re­lations who have not believed and received Jesus into their lives, to do so.

We are a couple of days from another Easter Resurrec­tion celebration and an oppor­tunity to reflect on our lives in relation to the significance of Easter. In the Bible, the only occasion Jesus, Saviour of the world commands us to celebrate is his death and resurrection.

He never commanded his followers to celebrate his birth but like everything else, we chose to ignore Jesus’s instructions and decided to do what pleases us, just like our forefather and mother in the Garden of Eden.

Advertisement

Let us deliberately choose to do things differently as Christians this Easter, so we can really benefit from all the blessings that the celebra­tion of the death and birth of Jesus, has on offer. Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is definitely insanity.

I choose to be different this Easter and I am believing God for a newness of life so God’s glory would be revealed in me to draw the unsaved to him. It is only when people espe­cially the unsaved, see the character of Christ in us, that they can be convinced about the authenticity of Jesus, as Saviour of the world, who can bring transformation in their lives too.

This is what would motivate them to surrender their lives to Jesus Christ. Let us make this Easter a memorable one that will be cherished for a long time. It is also a period for reconciliation and it would be great if in the spirit of Eas­ter, we would try to reach out to those who have wronged us or have a grudge against us.

This would demonstrate that we have indeed accepted Jesus and that our religious posture is not a sham. May the good Lord grant us the grace to love our neighbours as our­selves, demonstrating the love of God in the process.

Advertisement

Those who have lost their loved ones and Easter brings sad memories, may the good Lord comfort and strengthen you. God bless.

.NB: ‘CHANGE KOTOKA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TO KOFI BAAKO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT’

Continue Reading

Features

 Cosmetic deformities

 COSMETIC deformities refer to physical imper­fections or abnormalities that affect an individual’s appearance, often causing emotional distress and impact­ing their quality of life.

These deformities can be congenital, acquired, or result from various medical con­ditions or treatments. This article provides an in-depth exploration of cosmetic defor­mities, their types, causes, ef­fects, and treatment options.

Types of cosmetic deformi­ties

Cosmetic deformities can affect various parts of the body, including the face, skin, hair, nails, and teeth. Some common types of cosmetic deformities include:

Advertisement

1. Facial deformities: Congenital or acquired abnor­malities affecting the shape, structure, or appearance of the face, such as cleft lip and palate, facial paralysis, or facial asymmetry.

2. Skin deformities: Con­ditions affecting the skin’s texture, tone, or appearance, such as acne, scars, birth­marks, or skin discoloration.

3. Hair deformities: Abnor­malities affecting the hair’s growth, texture, or appear­ance, such as alopecia, hirsut­ism, or hair loss due to medi­cal conditions or treatments.

4. Nail deformities: Condi­tions affecting the shape, size, or appearance of the nails, such as nail fungus, nail psori­asis, or nail trauma.

Advertisement

5. Dental deformities: Abnormalities affecting the shape, size, or appearance of the teeth, such as tooth decay, tooth loss, or malocclu­sion.

Causes of cosmetic defor­mities

Cosmetic deformities can result from various factors, including:

1. Genetics: Congenital con­ditions or inherited traits can cause cosmetic deformities.

Advertisement

2. Trauma: Injuries or acci­dents can result in cosmetic deformities, such as scars or facial trauma.

3. Medical conditions: Cer­tain medical conditions, such as acne, psoriasis, or eczema, can cause cosmetic deformi­ties.

4. Treatments and proce­dures: Medical treatments, such as chemotherapy, radia­tion therapy, or surgery, can result in cosmetic deformities.

5. Aging and environmental factors: Aging, sun exposure, and environmental factors can contribute to cosmetic defor­mities, such as wrinkles, fine lines, or age spots.

Advertisement

Effects of cosmetic defor­mities

Cosmetic deformities can have significant emotional and psychological effects on individuals, including:

1. Low self-esteem: Cos­metic deformities can lead to feelings of insecurity, self-con­sciousness, and low self-es­teem.

2. Social anxiety: Individu­als with cosmetic deformities may experience social anxiety, avoiding social interactions or feeling embarrassed in public.

Advertisement

3. Emotional distress: Cos­metic deformities can cause emotional distress, including depression, anxiety, or stress.

4. Impact on quality of life: Cosmetic deformities can affect an individual’s quality of life, impacting their rela­tionships, career, or overall well-being.

Treatment options for cos­metic deformities

Various treatment options are available to address cos­metic deformities, including:

Advertisement

1. Surgical procedures: Surgical procedures, such as reconstructive surgery, cos­metic surgery, or dermatolog­ical surgery, can correct or improve cosmetic deformities.

2. Non-surgical treatments: Non-surgical treatments, such as laser therapy, chemical peels, or microdermabrasion, can address cosmetic con­cerns, such as skin texture, tone, or appearance.

3. Medical treatments: Medi­cal treatments, such as topical creams, oral medications, or injectable treatments, can address cosmetic concerns, such as acne, hair loss, or nail deformities.

4. Prosthetic and orthot­ic devices: Prosthetic and orthotic devices, such as wigs, hairpieces, or dental prosthet­ics, can help individuals with cosmetic deformities.

Advertisement

5. Counselling and thera­py: Counselling and therapy, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy or psychotherapy, can help individuals cope with the emotional and psychological effects of cosmetic deformi­ties.

Conclusion

Cosmetic deformities can have significant emotional and psychological effects on individuals, impacting their quality of life and overall well-being.

Understanding the types, causes, and effects of cos­metic deformities is crucial in addressing these concerns.

Advertisement

Various treatment options are available, ranging from surgical procedures to non-sur­gical treatments, medical treatments, prosthetic and orthotic devices, and counsel­ling and therapy.

By seeking professional help and support, individuals with cosmetic deformities can improve their appearance, boost their self-esteem, and enhance their overall quality of life.

Reference

1. “Cosmetic Deformities” by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending